IN the January number of this Magazine I attempted to show that flesh-eating is not in accordance with the dictates of morality or good taste. In the present paper I wish to meet some of the stock arguments that are most commonly advanced by the opponents of Food Reform, and to prove in each case that for those who are once convinced of the desirability of a Vegetarian diet, there is no insuperable difficulty in carrying their wishes into practical effect. In nine cases out of ten it will be found that these objections to Vegetarianism are based on no solid and rational grounds, but rather on some half-dozen prejudices which have taken deep root in the British mind, and are in one form or another continually reappearing. I am aware that in refuting these time-honoured fallacies, I am only going over ground which has already been repeatedly traversed. But as long as our opponents persist in advancing the same arguments, we Vegetarians may be pardoned for reproducing the same replies.
More by Henry Salt
- The Troubles of Travellers, The Dietetic Reformer and Vegetarian Messenger, September 1, 1886
- The Promotion of Kindness to Non-Existent Animals, The Vegetarian News, December 1928
- Some Results of Food Reform, The Food Reform Magazine, October 1882
- Socialists and Vegetarians, To-day, November 1896
- More Cabbage-Talk, The Vegetarian Messenger and Health Review, February 1926
- Medical Men and Food Reform, The Food Reform Magazine, July 1882
- Good Taste in Diet, The Food Reform Magazine, October-December 1883
- Concerning Cannibalism, The Humane Review, 1909-10
- The Ancient Sophistry, The Vegetarian News, April 1926
- Civilization of the Animals, Vegetarian Review, March 1896